Belarus

Woman is arrested by police in Belarus. Credit: Nexta Telegram channel

In the wake of President Alexander Lukashenko rigged re-election, Belarus’ state-run Investigative Committee reported receiving some 5,000 complaints of torture and ill-treatment. However, in August 2021 the Committee announced it would not initiate any criminal proceedings because the State’s use of force was in accordance with Belarusian law, “in the suppression of offences”.

In response to this statement, IRCT and IFEG asserted the importance of conducting effective forensic investigation of torture reports according to the international agreed principles set out in the Istanbul Protocol with a view to ensuring accountability and reparations for victims of these extensive human rights violations.

The activists of ICITB had gathered huge amounts of evidence of alleged torture. IFEG has the world-leading expertise to substantiate the allegations, and thus maintain pressure on international actors to sanction Lukashenko and his regime.

A year after our intervention, 21 States, working together with IRCT member in Denmark, Dignity, the UK’s Redress and 14 other Belarusian and international NGOs established the International Accountability Platform for Belarus (IAPB). The IAPB is mandated to gather evidence of crimes under international law committed by Belarusian authorities in the run-up to, during and after the 2020 presidential election, with the aim of contributing to accountability mechanisms, including eventual trials of perpetrators. The IRCT is a member of IAPB’s Advisory Council.

Watch Justice starts with truth: Torture in Belarus where a survivor of torture recalls he story and experts explain their work in documenting torture and rehabilitating survivors.

Forensic expert analysis on torture involve a comprehensive examination of all of the evidence of torture by medical experts, an assessment of that evidence against current best medical knowledge, and then the issuing of a qualified conclusion, such as a likelihood ratio, about how closely the evidence of torture matches the allegation of torture. In the Belarus report, IFEG found “compelling” evidence of a “coordinated policy” of torture. Had the evidence not been so strong, for example, the experts might have found merely “significant” evidence of “incidents” of torture.

Who are IFEG?

Established by the IRCT in 2009, members of IFEG are preeminent medical experts in the forensic examination of victims of torture, and its 42 members have examined around 40,000 cases and testified in court and other forums over 4,000 times.

Watch the Interview with Professor Djordje Alempijevic, explaining the role of forensic experts in substantiating allegations of torture, and his work on cases from Belarus

A team of medical experts from IRCT’s Independent Forensic Expert Group (IFEG) collaborated with local civil society actor, the International Committee for the Investigation of Torture in Belarus (ICITB), to examine 50 cases of detainees selected at random from a database of some 1,500 and found “highly patterned evidence of injuries” inflicted at 15 different police stations across Belarus.

In total, the 50 case files, chosen at random from some 1,500, included 130 documents with 613 pages, 286 photographs and four videos. Every case file contained an interview with an individual claiming to have been arrested between 9-12 August 2020 and subjected to torture or ill-treatment by the police and security forces during and/or subsequent to arrest. Almost every case file (49 cases) also included photographs of the complainant’s injuries taken at or before the time of interview. In addition, 35 cases included medical documentation. All case materials were translated by the ICITB from Belarusian to English.

Released in November 2021 following nine months of work, the IRCT’s ‘Belarus: A Coordinated Policy of Torture’ was the first such published report by forensic experts and found “compelling evidence” of “a coordinated policy and practice of systematic torture and ill-treatment against Belarusian citizens” detained for protesting 2020’s rigged presidential elections in Europe’s last dictatorship.

The report, made possible through a Swiss government donation, was widely published online and garnered interest from foreign ministries, NGOs and journalists. The UN Investigative Mechanism to investigate and document human rights violations in Belarus adopted the IRCT’s findings in its latest report and the IRCT has been collaborating with the mechanism to gain access to evidence.

Belarus report in English

Belarus report in Russian

OMCT On Belarus

oMCT Report

Redress On Belarus